Tag Franklin St church of Christ

Evidence for our Faith: the Population Problem

The Preacher Leave a comment

The Population Problem: A Case for a Young Earth

One of the most intriguing arguments for a young Earth comes from an analysis of human population growth. If humans have existed for 300,000 years or more, as conventional science suggests, the number of humans alive today—or even in recorded history—presents a logical conundrum when viewed through the lens of population dynamics. By examining reasonable growth rates and historical data, the evidence aligns more closely with a young Earth timeline, consistent with a biblical framework of roughly 6,000 to 10,000 years.

By looking at how quickly people multiply and comparing ancient survival rates to today’s, the current 8 billion population supports a short history rooted in reason and scripture.

Picture the biblical Flood 4,500 years ago, leaving just Noah’s family of eight (Genesis 7:13). With a small, steady growth rate—much lower than today’s because fewer babies survived back then—the population could climb to 8 billion in that time. It’s a straightforward buildup: start small, grow consistently, and hit today’s number without any wild leaps. This fits the tough conditions of ancient life, where disease and hardship kept survival rates low, with studies showing only about half of kids made it to adulthood (Volk & Atkinson, 2013, Historical Biology).

Now imagine humans starting 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, as some claim. Even with a tiny growth rate, the numbers explode way past 8 billion—think hundreds of billions or more in just a fraction of that time. To stay at today’s population, growth would have to stall almost completely for centuries, suggesting endless disasters like plagues or wars. But history shows humans thriving and spreading since about 10,000 years ago, not stuck in a rut. And where are all the graves from those supposed billions of extra people?

Today’s faster growth—around 0.8% a year—comes from better medicine and food, things ancient people didn’t have. Apply that rate backward over thousands of years, and you’d get ridiculous numbers, far beyond what Earth could hold. The Bible’s call to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 9:1) and the spread of nations (Genesis 10) match a 4,500-year rise to 8 billion, backed by genetic hints of a recent common ancestor (Carter, 2007, Journal of Creation). A 200,000–300,000-year story, though, needs constant excuses to explain why we’re not overrun with people.

In short, a young Earth makes sense: a steady climb from a handful to 8 billion in a few thousand years, no tricks needed. The longer timeline buckles under its own logic, leaving too many questions and not enough bones!


Agape,
spencer

Sources:
o Carter, R. (2007). “Mitochondrial Diversity within Modern Humans.” Journal of Creation, 21(2).
o Volk, A. A., & Atkinson, J. A. (2013). “Infant and Child Death in the Human Environment of Evolutionary Adaptation.” Historical Biology, 25(5).
o Genesis 5, 7:13, 9:1, 10 (KJV).

Evidence for our faith: Fine Tuning

The Preacher Leave a comment

The Laws of Physics: Evidence of a Lawgiver

Could the laws of physics—precise, universal, and life-sustaining—point to a purposeful design, a Lawgiver shaping the cosmos? Modern science offers compelling clues that resonate with biblical accounts, suggesting God’s hand in creation.

The universe’s fine-tuning is astonishing. Physicist Paul Davies (The Cosmic Blueprint, 1988) highlights that if gravity shifted by one part in 10^40, stars like our Sun—vital for life—wouldn’t exist.

Roger Penrose (The Emperor’s New Mind, 1989) calculates the initial entropy —essentially the universe’s starting level of disorder— required odds-defying precision (1 in 10^10^123) for a habitable cosmos. This suggests intent, not chance, mirroring Genesis 1:1: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”

Equally remarkable is the rational order of these laws. Eugene Wigner’s 1960 paper, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics,” marvels at how abstract equations govern reality with uncanny accuracy. Why does the universe follow such logic? Psalm 19:1 offers a poetic parallel: “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands,” declaring a mind behind the order.

The universe’s origin adds intrigue. The Big Bang, confirmed by cosmic microwave background radiation (Penzias and Wilson, 1965), marks a sudden start from nothing. Stephen Hawking (A Brief History of Time, 1988) notes this challenges materialist explanations, as “nothing” producing “something” implies a cause beyond physics. Genesis 1:3—“And God said, ‘Let there be light’”—echoes this emergence.

The anthropic principle—meaning the universe seems tailored for human life— deepens the case. Michael Denton (Nature’s Destiny, 1998) argues that physical laws governing carbon, water, and oxygen are uniquely tuned for life. Alter any constant slightly, and biology collapses. Isaiah 45:18 aligns: God “formed the earth… to be inhabited.” Such specificity strains random odds, suggesting deliberate calibration.

Skeptics propose a multiverse to explain our “lucky” universe, but this lacks evidence and complicates rather than clarifies. A single, purposeful design aligns with Occam’s razor. Romans 1:20 ties it together: God’s “invisible qualities… have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made.” The laws of physics—fine-tuned, rational, and life-enabling— more than whisper of a Lawgiver, inviting us to ponder the Creator behind the cosmos.

Agape,

Spencer

Sources:

  • Davies, Paul. The Cosmic Blueprint. 1988.
  • Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. 1989.
  • Wigner, Eugene. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics.” 1960.
  • Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time. 1988.

Denton, Michael. Nature’s Destiny. 1998.

Calling on the name of the Lord: What is it really?

The Preacher Leave a comment

Calling on the name of the Lord:

Prayer or obedience?

Acts 22:16 (KJV) states:

“And now why tarriest thou? Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.”

This verse records Ananias’ instructions to Saul (later Paul) regarding his conversion. To understand what it means to “call on the name of the Lord,” we must look at how the Bible defines and uses this phrase.

1. Calling on the Name of the Lord Involves Obedience

Acts 22:16 ties “calling on the name of the Lord” directly to baptism, which is the moment when Saul’s sins were washed away. This aligns with Jesus’ own words in Mark 16:16:

“He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.”

Calling on the name of the Lord, then, is not merely a verbal plea but involves obedient action. This is further clarified by Romans 10:13-14:

“For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?”

Paul, writing later, shows that calling on the Lord’s name requires hearing the gospel, believing, and responding in obedience.

2. Calling on the Name of the Lord Is Not Just Prayer

Some assume that calling on the Lord’s name is merely saying a prayer for salvation, but Scripture does not support this idea. Consider Jesus’ words in Matthew 7:21:

“Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.”

Merely addressing Jesus as Lord does not save—doing His will does. This is consistent with Acts 22:16, where Paul had already been praying (Acts 9:11), yet he still needed to be baptized to wash away his sins.

3. Biblical Examples of Calling on the Name of the Lord

The phrase “call on the name of the Lord” is used throughout Scripture in connection with worship and obedience.

• Genesis 4:26 – “Then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.” This refers to worship and devotion to God.

• Joel 2:32 (quoted in Acts 2:21) – “Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered.” This was fulfilled in Acts 2, where Peter preached that repentance and baptism in Jesus’ name were necessary for salvation (Acts 2:38).

In Acts 2, the people called upon the Lord by obeying Peter’s command to repent and be baptized. This directly parallels Acts 22:16, where Paul was instructed to do the same.

So what now?

To “call on the name of the Lord” is to appeal to Him for salvation by faithful obedience to His commands. Acts 22:16 shows that Saul (Paul) did this when he was baptized, at which point his sins were washed away. This is consistent with how the phrase is used throughout the Bible—faith in action, not merely words.

Spencer

Franklin & Juniper St

church of Christ

Borger, Tx

Evidence for our faith: the Cambrian Explosion

The Preacher Leave a comment

The Cambrian Explosion presents one of the most compelling challenges to evolutionary theory and a powerful argument for sudden creation. This event, characterized by the sudden appearance of diverse and complex animal forms in the fossil record, aligns with the Cosmological Argument, suggesting a Creator’s intervention in the origins of life.

During the Cambrian Explosion, nearly all the major animal phyla appeared abruptly without clear evolutionary precursors. Trilobites, arthropods, mollusks, echinoderms, and many other complex organisms emerged fully formed with distinct body plans. This event contradicts Darwinian expectations of gradual transitions through intermediate forms over long periods. Instead, the fossil evidence supports the idea of sudden creation, where life forms were introduced in a fully functional and diverse state.

One of the most striking examples is the trilobite, which possessed highly complex compound eyes with dozens of lenses. These eyes required precise anatomical and biochemical systems to function, challenging the idea of their gradual evolution. Such sophisticated designs appearing suddenly in the fossil record point toward intelligent design rather than chance processes.

The abruptness of the Cambrian Explosion highlights the inadequacy of naturalistic explanations. Evolutionary models have struggled to account for the lack of transitional fossils leading to these diverse life forms. Attempts to explain this event, such as the “genetic toolkit” hypothesis, fail to address why the genetic information and mechanisms for such diversity appeared so suddenly and simultaneously.

From a biblical perspective, the Cambrian Explosion aligns with the narrative of creation as described in Genesis. Genesis 1:20-21 declares, “And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life… And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind.” This description of life appearing abundantly and fully formed mirrors the pattern observed in the Cambrian Explosion.

The Cambrian Explosion provides compelling evidence for sudden creation, challenging the gradualism central to Darwinian evolution. The abrupt appearance of complex organisms, lacking evolutionary precursors, suggests a Creator who brings forth life in abundance and complexity.

Another theory for the Cambrian explosion held by some creationists interprets it as consistent with the biblical account of a worldwide flood, as described in Genesis 6–9.

Sources:

  • Stephen C. Meyer, Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design

Agape, Spencer

Evidence for our Faith: Irreducible Complexity

The Preacher Leave a comment
A Mousetrap represents an example of irreducible complexity

The concept of irreducible complexity presents a powerful argument for the existence of a Designer. Coined by biochemist Michael Behe, irreducible complexity refers to biological systems composed of multiple interdependent parts, all of which must function simultaneously for the system to work. Such systems cannot arise through gradual evolutionary processes, as removing even one component renders the system nonfunctional. This hallmark of intentional design points to the existence of an intelligent Creator.

One of the most cited examples of irreducible complexity is the bacterial flagellum, a microscopic rotary motor used by bacteria for propulsion. The flagellum comprises over 40 distinct protein components, including a rotor, stator, drive shaft, bushing, and propeller. Each part is precisely shaped and positioned to interact with the others, enabling the flagellum to rotate at incredible speeds—up to 100,000 revolutions per minute in some species.

The flagellum’s functionality depends on the presence of all its components working together. If even one protein is missing, the entire system fails, offering no advantage to the organism. This contradicts Darwinian evolutionary mechanisms, which propose gradual modifications and natural selection as the means of developing complex structures. As Behe argues in his book Darwin’s Black Box, such irreducible systems could not have evolved step-by-step, as intermediate stages would confer no benefit to survival.

The Bible supports the idea of intentional design in creation. Job 12:7-9 invites us to consider the evidence of God’s hand in the natural world: “But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowls of the air, and they shall tell thee: Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee: and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee. Who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the Lord hath wrought this?” The intricacy of the flagellum echoes this truth, revealing the handiwork of a Creator. The bacterial flagellum, a marvel of engineering, stands as evidence of God’s power and wisdom.

Scientifically, attempts to explain the flagellum through evolutionary mechanisms remain inconclusive. Proposals like co-option, which suggest that existing proteins were repurposed for new functions, fail to account for the precise timing, positioning, and coordination required to assemble the flagellum. Such precision implies design, not chance.

Irreducible complexity in systems like the bacterial flagellum provides compelling proof of a Designer. Its intricate structure and functionality defy evolutionary explanations, aligning with biblical declarations of God’s creative work. This undeniable complexity reflects the harmony between science and faith, pointing to the Creator behind the design.

Agape,

Spencer

Jesus is the one to follow when we’re HURTING

The Preacher Leave a comment

Hope and Healing in Christ for the Hurting

Life is full of hardship. Suffering, loss, and disappointment are part of the human experience. Some struggle with grief, others with betrayal, loneliness, or physical pain. No one is immune to the trials of life. Yet, in the midst of sorrow, there is One who offers healing, hope, and peace—Jesus Christ.

Jesus understands suffering because He experienced it firsthand. Isaiah 53:3 describes Him as “a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief.” He knew what it was like to be rejected, betrayed, and physically tormented. He endured humiliation and pain on the cross, bearing the weight of humanity’s sin. Because of this, He is uniquely qualified to comfort those who are hurting. Hebrews 4:15 assures us that we have a Savior who can sympathize with our weaknesses, for He was “tempted like as we are, yet without sin.”

Hope in Christ for the Hurt of This Life

Pain can make life feel unbearable. The world offers temporary distractions, but they cannot bring lasting peace. Only Christ provides true hope. John 16:33 reminds us of this reality: “In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.” The suffering of this present life is temporary, but the joy found in Christ is eternal. Paul declares in Romans 8:18, “For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” When we trust in Christ, we gain a perspective that allows us to endure, knowing that something far greater awaits.

“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” (Galatians 3:27)

Understanding from Christ, Who Endured Suffering

One of the most comforting truths about Jesus is that He understands human suffering. He was betrayed by a close friend (Luke 22:48; Psalm 41:9), falsely accused (Matthew 26:59-60), mocked (Matthew 27:29-31), and crucified (Luke 23:33). He knows what it feels like to be abandoned, rejected, and mistreated. This means that when we pour out our hearts to Him, we are speaking to One who truly understands. Psalm 34:18 assures us, “The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart.”

“Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?” (Romans 6:3)

Rest and Peace in His Forgiveness and Mercy

Many suffer not only from external circumstances but also from the weight of guilt and shame. Sin leaves scars, and the burden of past mistakes can feel overwhelming. Yet, Jesus offers complete forgiveness. Matthew 11:28 invites us, “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” Through His sacrifice, we are freed from sin’s condemnation. Psalm 103:12 declares, “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” In Christ, we find peace, knowing that our past does not define us.

“And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” (Acts 22:16)

Truth, Life, and True Joy

Many search for meaning in temporary pleasures, but Jesus alone is the source of true life. He declares in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” The joy He gives is not dependent on circumstances but is rooted in a relationship with Him. John 15:11 states, “These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.”

“And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.” (Acts 8:39)

Jesus, Our Intercessor

For those who feel distant from God, Jesus bridges the gap. 1 Timothy 2:5 tells us, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” He intercedes for us before the Father, offering continual access to God’s grace and help.

“And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.” (1John 3:22)

He Never Leaves nor Forsakes Us

Loneliness is one of the deepest forms of suffering. Yet, Jesus promises, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Hebrews 13:5). Even when we feel abandoned, He is always near.

“And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.” (1John 3:24)

Good Can Come Despite the Pain

While suffering is hard, God can bring blessings out of trials. Romans 8:28 reassures us, “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God.” Even when we don’t understand, we can trust that He can bring about good despite the pain and suffering in this life.

“My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.” (James 1:2-3)

Conclusion

No matter what pain or sorrow you carry, Jesus offers hope and healing. Turn to Him, and you will find peace, understanding, and the strength to endure. “Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.” (1 Peter 5:7)

Agape

Spencer

There is a way you may know if you have eternal life.

Evidence for our faith: Ontological Argument

The Preacher Leave a comment

The ontological argument, first articulated by St. Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th century, explores the concept of God as a necessary being whose existence is self-evident through reason. Unlike other arguments that rely on empirical evidence, the ontological argument is a philosophical proof, rooted in the nature of God as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.” Modern developments in philosophy and science reinforce the logic of this timeless argument.

The Concept of Necessary Existence. The argument begins with the definition of God as the greatest conceivable being. Such a being must exist not only in the mind (as a concept) but also in reality, for existence in reality is greater than existence solely in thought. If God existed only as a concept, then a greater being—one that exists in reality—could be imagined, contradicting the original definition. Thus, God must exist in reality.

This concept aligns with the biblical understanding of God as self-existent and eternal. Exodus 3:14 encapsulates this when God declares, “I AM THAT I AM,” signifying His independent and necessary existence.

Modern Philosophical Insights. Contemporary philosophers like Alvin Plantinga have refined the argument, framing it within modal logic. Plantinga’s version argues that if it is possible for a maximally great being to exist, then such a being exists in some possible world. If it exists in one possible world, its necessary nature means it exists in all possible worlds—including our own.

This formulation strengthens the argument by considering God’s existence as necessary rather than contingent. A necessary being is one that must exist; its non-existence is impossible. This necessity aligns with the biblical portrayal of God as eternal and unchanging (Malachi 3:6).

Scientific Corroboration of a Necessary Cause. While the ontological argument is primarily philosophical, modern science lends indirect support. The universe, with its intricate fine-tuning, suggests a source that exists outside time and space. This aligns with the concept of a necessary being who undergirds all reality. Romans 1:20 reflects this idea: “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made.”

Implications of God’s Necessary Existence. If God’s existence is necessary, He is the source of all contingent reality—everything that depends on something else to exist. This explains not only the existence of the universe but also the rationality, order, and purpose evident in creation.

Conclusion. The ontological argument, grounded in reason and supported by scripture, reveals God as the necessary being upon whom all existence depends. As Colossians 1:17 declares, “And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” This philosophical proof, when coupled with scripture, underscores the truth of God’s eternal and unchanging nature.

Sources:
• Plantinga, A. The Nature of Necessity.
• Craig, W.L. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics.
• Exodus 3:14, Romans 1:20, Malachi 3:6, Colossians 1:17 (KJV).


Agape,
Spencer

Bible Reading Plan 2025

The Preacher Leave a comment

Not Just another Bible Reading plan you won’t finish.

It’s that time of year again when we encourage folks to find the right Bible reading plan that works for them. If you’ve ever struggled to read the Bible consistently, having a structured plan can make all the difference.

Before we introduce the 2025 plan, let’s take a moment to reflect on why a regular approach to Bible reading is so valuable.

The Word of God is our spiritual nourishment (Matthew 4:4), and regular reading allows us to grow in knowledge, faith, and obedience. A well thought out plan provides consistency and focus, ensuring that we engage with the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). It also helps us build a daily habit of spending time in God’s Word, which strengthens our walk with Him and equips us for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

Following is a simplified version of the Bible Reading Plan I’ve followed for the last few years. This plan is both simple and engaging. By breaking up the reading between the Old and New Testaments it helps to break up any monotony that keeps many folks from finishing.

 
The Monday Through Friday 5-day Reading Plan
This year’s plan has us reading the New Testament twice while incorporating the Old Testament and Poetry/Wisdom books. It is structured to give variety and balance:

• Mondays: Read 4 chapters from the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John – 89 chapters twice).

• Tuesdays: Read 4 chapters from Paul’s letters (Romans through Philemon – 87 chapters twice).

• Wednesdays: Read 4 chapters from the General Letters and Acts (Hebrews through Revelation and Acts – 84 chapters twice).

• Thursdays & Fridays: Read 7 chapters each on these two days from the Old Testament History & prophets (728 chapters total).

• Monday–Friday: Add 1 chapter each morning or evening from the Poetry and Wisdom books (Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon – 201 chapters total). With the 59 days to spare I’ll usually read Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, & Song of Solomon again.

By following this plan, you will read through the entire Bible in a year, with the New Testament covered twice.

Why This Plan Works
As New Testament Christians, the focus on the New Covenant is especially meaningful. By reading the New Testament twice in a year—just 4 chapters a day—you’ll gain a deeper understanding of Jesus’ life and teachings, as well as learning about the Lord’s church. In about 15–20 minutes each day, you can reflect on God’s grace and truth revealed through His Word.

The plan also ensures exposure to the Old Testament, grounding us in God’s purpose, and wisdom. With its organized structure, each day brings fresh motivation and variety, helping you stay engaged.

Imagine this time next year, having read about the life of Jesus twice and journeyed through the entire Bible. You’ll gain not just knowledge, but also a richer, deeper relationship with God through His Word. Start your journey today, and see how consistent Bible reading transforms your life in 2025!.

Agape,
Spencer

Who was in the MANGER?

The Preacher Leave a comment

Who Was in the Manger?
The question, “Who was in the manger?” directs our thoughts to a singular event in human history: the birth of Jesus Christ. The identity of the One lying in that humble setting reveals profound truths about God’s plan for mankind.

The Messiah
The child in the manger was the long-awaited Messiah, the Anointed One sent to save humanity. Andrew declared in John 1:41, “We have found the Messiah.” The angels echoed this truth to shepherds, proclaiming, “Unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:11). This Messiah came not just for Israel but for all mankind, as Matthew 1:21 reveals: “He shall save his people from their sins.” Paul emphasized in 1 Timothy 1:15 that Christ’s purpose was to save sinners.

Alpha and Omega
The baby in the manger was more than just the Savior; He was the eternal God, the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end (Revelation 1:8). While the world saw a helpless infant, in Him dwelled the fullness of deity. His coming was the intersection of the Creator stepping into His creation.

Name Above All Names
The child born in Bethlehem carried the name above all names, one that is unequaled in power and significance. Acts 4:12 declares, “There is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Philippians 2:9 states that God exalted Jesus and gave Him a name above every name.

God’s Only and Beloved Son
This infant was God’s only begotten and beloved Son, sent to fulfill His divine mission. Mark 9:7 records God’s declaration: “This is my beloved Son: hear him.” Peter confessed in Matthew 16:16, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” As God’s Son, Jesus was uniquely qualified to reconcile humanity to the Father, demonstrating both God’s love and His justice.

Eternal Life Giver
In the manger lay the giver of eternal life. John 1 portrays Him as the Word, the source of life and light for all. Jesus Himself said, “The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life” (John 6:63). This eternal life is not only a future promise but a present reality for those who believe in Hime and obey the Gospel.

The Root and Offspring of David
Finally, the child in the manger was both the root and offspring of David, fulfilling prophecy and confirming His rightful place as King. Revelation 22:16 proclaims, “I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.” He is the Lion of the tribe of Judah, worthy to reign forever (Revelation 5:5).

The one in the manger was no ordinary child. He was the Messiah, the Alpha and Omega, the name above all names, God’s beloved Son, the eternal life giver, and the root and offspring of David. While we don’t know when Jesus was born, we take this time of year as an opportunity to talk to folks because many are already thinking about Him. It’s an opportunity to remind the world of who Jesus truly is and why He came: to offer salvation and eternal hope to all who believe. Let’s use this season and every season to share the good news of the Savior who changed everything.

Agape,

Spencer

Unshakable Sovereignty: How God’s Will and Human Will Coexist

The Preacher Leave a comment

The basic error in the Calvinist understanding of God’s sovereignty lies in their assumption that God’s sovereignty means He must exercise absolute, irresistible control over every aspect of human will.

Calvinism argues that because God is sovereign, no created being could truly have the option to reject Him, as this would supposedly compromise His power. As a result, Calvinism teaches that God must first miraculously regenerate a person’s heart to make them capable of seeking Him, thus removing the genuine exercise of free will in the process of coming to faith.

However, this view misunderstands the nature of sovereignty. True sovereignty means God possesses ultimate authority and power, including the authority to grant His creation the freedom to choose, even if that choice involves rejection. By equating sovereignty with strict determinism, Calvinism limits God, suggesting He cannot be truly sovereign unless He exercises control in a particular way. But as seen in Scripture, God’s sovereignty encompasses the ability to bring about His purposes despite human choices, even when those choices oppose Him. This view implies God’s sovereignty cannot accommodate human freedom without being diminished. Biblically, God’s sovereignty is displayed in His supreme ability to accomplish His purposes through or in spite of human decisions.

The sovereignty of God is neither dependent on human response nor diminished by human rejection. To assert that God’s sovereignty is undermined if someone rejects Him is to misunderstand what sovereignty means. Sovereignty refers to supreme authority and power over all things, independent of external influence or acceptance. Here are key points to help understand this:

God’s Sovereignty as Absolute: Scripture portrays God’s sovereignty as all-encompassing and unchanging. In passages like Isaiah 46:9-10, God declares, “I am God, and there is none like me… My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure.” God’s authority and purpose are not contingent on human acceptance but are established solely by His will.

God Permits Free Will without Diminishing His Sovereignty: Sovereignty includes the authority to grant free will to humanity. In His omnipotence, God has chosen to allow individuals the freedom to accept or reject Him, but this choice does not lessen His power. In Acts 17:30-31, Paul speaks of God’s patient desire for repentance, showing that God’s authority remains, even as He allows humanity space for choice. “And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.”

Judgment Demonstrates Sovereign Authority: When humans reject God, it doesn’t affect His sovereignty but rather reveals it. God’s authority is demonstrated through judgment as well as mercy. 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9 describes that those who “know not God” or “obey not the gospel” will face His judgment. This action affirms His authority over all creation, holding all accountable whether or not they choose to honor Him.

Christ’s Rejection Does Not Diminish God’s Power: Jesus Himself faced widespread rejection, yet God’s plan of salvation was fulfilled, displaying His sovereignty. John 1:11 says, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not,” yet the mission was accomplished by God’s power, demonstrating that rejection by some does not disrupt God’s overarching purpose.

Free Will Does Not Thwart God’s Sovereignty: God’s sovereignty is not threatened by human opposition or rejection, as He is fully capable of bringing His plans to fruition regardless of human response. In Luke 3:8, John the Baptist tells the crowds, “Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” This statement underscores that God’s purposes are not dependent on human lineage, acceptance, or compliance; if one avenue is closed, He has countless ways to fulfill His plan. God’s authority and ability remain supreme, unaffected by human resistance.

Therefore, God’s sovereignty is upheld through His supreme authority, His allowance of free will, and His ultimate judgment. Human rejection of God does not weaken His sovereignty but instead highlights the greatness of His rule over a world in which He allows choice, yet remains in complete control.

“For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;”

Agape,
Spencer